Alliance for Democracy

Citizens United moves call for constitutional amendment‏

The furor continues about the outrageous Supreme Court decision last week.  The SC ruled in effect that corporations are the same as people, at least with regard to the 1st and 14th amendments – the 1st guaranteeing our free speech rights and the 14th guaranteeing equal protection of the law.  The 14th Amendment was enacted following the Civil War to establish that in America any citizen (read male citizen at that time) born or naturalized in the United States shall not be deprived of their rights by either the federal government or any state.  No mention there that this included corporations. 
 
But this court, dominated by conservative corporatist activist judges, has overturned over a century of legal precedent to find restrictions on corporate expenditure of their treasuries to be an infringement on the free speech rights of corporations. The flood gates of corporate money has been released from most limitations and bounds, and the effect will be seen in the upcoming Congressional elections later this year.
 
In anticipation of this SC decision, the Alliance for Democracy joined with other grassroots, pro-democracy organizations development of an umbrella organization called the Campaign to Legalize Democracy and on the day of the decision release begun our effort to Amend the Constitution via the website, www.movetoamend.org.  Please go there and sign the letter calling for a constitutional amendment stating that corporations are not people and do not have the rights of people. 
 
See the following TruthOut article on other efforts in the same vein.
 
Here is Portland, the Portland Chapter of Alliance for Democracy has invited David Cobb and Riki Ott to come and speak and organize the community to OVERRULE THE COURT.  As the attached flyer notes,
 
IT’S TIME TO CHANGE THE RULES
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United is just the latest – and most blatant – example that corporatons hav hijacked our governmnet.  the ruling leaves ordinary citizens little opportunity to participate inmaking the fundamental decisions of our lives.  Corporations ar using our legal system against us.
 
IT’S TIME FOR A PEOPLE’S MOVEMENT
We must amend the U.S. Constitution and end the illegitimate legal doctrines preventing the American people fro governing themselves.
The event is scheduled for Monday, March 1st starting at 7 PM at the First Unitarian Church at SW 12th and Salmon

Please print the event flyer, give to your friends, post in your favorite coffee shop, on the boards of your school, office or wherever you might be. Click here

Alliance for Democracy is also working on a rally/march for sometime during the first half of March to demand an end to corporate personhood and a return to democratic principles. Watch for more details soon.

David e. Delk, Alliance for Democracy – Portland Chapter, 503.232.5495


Calls for Constitutional Amendment to Tackle Campaign Finance Ruling

Thursday 04 February 2010

by: Kyle Berlin, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Thorne Enterprises, Doug Wallick)

Two lawmakers introduced a bill this week aimed at adding an amendment to the US Constitution, which would allow Congress and the states to regulate political expenditures by corporations.

The amendment bill is in response to a recent landmark Supreme Court ruling, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down several longstanding prohibitions on corporate political contributions, saying legislative measures to control such spending infringed upon corporate First Amendment free speech rights.

“The ruling reached by the Roberts’ Court overturned decades of legal precedent by allowing corporations unfettered spending in our political campaigns,” said Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Maryland), who, along with Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan), introduced the amendment into the House Judiciary Committee.

“Another law will not rectify this disastrous decision. A constitutional amendment is necessary to undo what this court has done.”

The text of the first section of the amendment reads: “The sovereign right of the people to govern being essential to a free democracy, Congress and the States may regulate the expenditure of funds for political speech by any corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity.”

At a Senate Rules Committee hearing Tuesday, Sen. John Kerry (D-Massachusetts) said, “I think we need a constitutional amendment to make it clear once and for all that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individuals.” Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pennsylvania) has also thrown his weight behind the proposal.

The amendment is being supported by a number of nonprofit organizations dedicated to preserving voting and free speech rights, in an effort to mobilize popular support.

“This movement is an attempt to have the First Amendment restored to its proper purpose,” said John Bonifaz, the legal director of Voter Action, one of the organizations behind the initiative. “And that is to protect people, not corporations.”

Bonifaz said that Voter Action and its partners, which have created a web site to push the proposal, are seeking bipartisan support. Republican support would be necessary to make it through the two-thirds vote in Congress and the vote of three-quarters of state legislatures that would be required for the amendment to pass.

“We believe that this is an issue that reaches across party lines, and across political persuasions,” Bonifaz said. However, he admitted that the amendment has not been publicly supported by any Republican, though he stressed that the initiative was still in “the early stages.”

The announcement comes amid a flurry of legislation designed to counter the effects of the ruling, which might also allow foreign corporations that are incorporated in the US to spend money on political advertising.

In his State of the Union speech, President Obama took aim at the ruling, which he said “reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections.”

“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities,” Obama said. “They should be decided by the American people, and I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems.”

Democrats argued that the ruling would allow US subsidiaries of foreign companies and foreign companies incorporated in the US to contribute unlimited amounts of money on political expenditures like advertisements. 

Some Republicans, though, have indicated their opposition to further restricting the rights of corporations gained in the ruling, and argued that the ruling does not change US laws that prohibit foreign corporations from contributing directly to political campaigns.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) said that President Obama was “completely wrong” in his assessment of the ruling.

“Foreign corporations were prohibited from participating in US elections before the Citizens United decision, and they still are,” McConnell said.

Both sides agree that much of the conflict stems from the Supreme Court’s decision to treat corporations like individuals.

“We’ve got to make it clear that corporations are not people, and don’t have the same free speech rights,” Bonifaz said. “Corporations were never intended to be protected by the framers.”

Advertisements

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Steve Hodge said, on February 19, 2010 at 9:50 am

    I think the problem we’re facing is that the tradional way of viewing the world and the aggressors in it, has changed. The threat is no longer from Nations or Nation States, it’s from entities with annual profits greater than many nations. These corporations attack individual liberties through treaties, not laws, and they use their vast media empires to control thought and shift the anger of the american people to those least able to defend themselves, the poor and the immigrants. It is a sinister kind of attack that most do not realize is taking place.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: